Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Land Calcasieu Parish et al
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C |
Bill Craig Neugent and Land Calcasieu Parish |
2:2023cv01374 |
October 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Kathleen Kay |
Condemnation |
15 U.S.C. ยง 717 Natural Gas Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Rule 41(a) NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Port Arthur Pipeline L L C (aty,McConnell, Richard) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Land Calcasieu Parish, Bill Craig Neugent. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Port Arthur Pipeline L L C. (aty,McConnell, Richard) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Commencement of Condemnation Action (FRCP Rule 71.1 (D) by Port Arthur Pipeline L L C re #1 Complaint, (aty,McConnell, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Condemnation of Pipeline Right-Of-Way and Servitude and Surface Servitude against Bill Craig Neugent (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5710918) filed by Port Arthur Pipeline L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A -Right of Way Services Inc.-Plat of Survey, #2 Exhibit Ex. B- Easement and Servitude Agreement)(Attorney Richard Dean McConnell, Jr added to party Port Arthur Pipeline L L C(pty:pla))(aty,McConnell, Richard) Modified on 10/3/2023 to indicate #3 Civil Cover Sheet submitted. (Crick, S). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.