Gusme et al v. F C A U S L L C
| Jesse Gusme and Janay Gusme |
| F C A U S L L C |
| 2:2023cv01652 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| James D Cain |
| Kathleen Kay |
| Thomas P LeBlanc |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY issued by the Clerk. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas P LeBlanc. Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay no longer assigned to case. All future filings should bear the name of the new judge assignment. Approved by Judge Terry A Doughty on 1/9/2024. (crt,Kiper, C) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to F C A U S L L C. (crt,Whitener, M) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Whitener, M) |
| DIVISIONAL TRANSFER of Old Case Number 1:23-cv-1652 from Alexandria Division to Lake Charles Division. New Case Number 2:23-cv-1652. (crt,Whitener, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against F C A U S L L C with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5770223) filed by Janay Gusme, Jesse Gusme. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Fred A Pharis added to party Janay Gusme(pty:pla), Attorney Fred A Pharis added to party Jesse Gusme(pty:pla))(aty,Pharis, Fred) Modified docket text on 11/29/2023 (Whitener, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
