Thompson v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc et al
Brandy Thompson |
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Life Insurance Company of North America, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc and Life Insurance Co of North America |
2:2024cv00086 |
January 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
James D Cain |
Thomas P LeBlanc |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc waiver sent on 1/23/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Attorney Michelle I Anderson added to party Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc(pty:dft)) (aty,Anderson, Michelle) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc, Life Insurance Co of North America. (crt,Chavis, J) |
CASE Assigned to Judge James D Cain, Jr and Magistrate Judge Thomas P LeBlanc. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Life Insurance Company of North America (Filing fee $405, receipt number CLAWDC-5831010) filed by Brandy Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ, #3 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney David Craig Pellegrin, Jr added to party Brandy Thompson(pty:pla))(aty,Pellegrin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.