Lijadu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service et al
3:2006cv00518 |
March 27, 2006 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 75 MOTION to Confirm Default Judgment filed by plaintiff as a Motion for Summary Judgment, RECOMMENDING plaintiff's motion to confirm a default judgment be GRANTED, and that judgment be entered in favor of plainti ff and against defendant, Pam Poole, holding defendant liable, in her individual capacity, for the deprivation of plaintiff's constitutional right to adequate medical care. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that compensatory damages be awarded in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Pam Poole, in her individual capacity, in an amount established by plaintiff's prospective submission of competent summary judgment evidence, together with punitive damages, if warranted in the court's discretion. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 1/7/09. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lijadu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.