Lijadu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service et al
Case Number: 3:2006cv00518
Filed: March 27, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 75 MOTION to Confirm Default Judgment filed by plaintiff as a Motion for Summary Judgment, RECOMMENDING plaintiff's motion to confirm a default judgment be GRANTED, and that judgment be entered in favor of plainti ff and against defendant, Pam Poole, holding defendant liable, in her individual capacity, for the deprivation of plaintiff's constitutional right to adequate medical care. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that compensatory damages be awarded in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Pam Poole, in her individual capacity, in an amount established by plaintiff's prospective submission of competent summary judgment evidence, together with punitive damages, if warranted in the court's discretion. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 1/7/09. (crt,Crawford, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lijadu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?