Burns v. Smith et al
| James Burns |
| Lydia Smith, Jimmy Shivers and Larry G Cox |
| 3:2008cv00428 |
| March 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Madison |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
JUDGMENT granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and that Judgment is entered in favor of said Defendants, dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's individual and official capacity claims, in their entirety. Fed.r.Civ.P. 56. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 5/3/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
72
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jimmy Shivers, Larry G Cox, Lydia Smith. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the motion for summary judgment be GRANTED IN PART, and that judgment be entered in favor of said defendants, dis missing with prejudice plaintiff's individual capacity claims for inadequate medical care and diet, placement in lockdown, incidental macing, excessive force injuries to other inmates, withholding of dessert, and constant illumination, only. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that defendants' motion otherwise be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 07/16/09. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
