Little Bell L L C v. Centerpoint Energy Inc
| Little Bell L L C, Martha Perry Amman and Paula Perry Blackman |
| Centerpoint Energy Inc, Centerpoint Energy Services Inc and Centerpoint Energy-Mississippi River Transmission Corp |
| 3:2009cv00712 |
| April 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| Morehouse |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
RULING re 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Centerpoint Energy Services Inc, Centerpoint Energy Mississippi River Transmission L L C, Centerpoint Energy Inc; 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Martha Perry Amman, Littl e Bell L L C, Paula Perry Blackman and 70 Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co L L C, Centerpoint Energy Mississippi River Transmission L L C. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 1/4/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 62 Report and Recommendations re 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Martha Perry Amman, Little Bell L L C, Paula Perry Blackman. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants-in-Counterclaim and Defendants-in-Intervention is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 09/27/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
