Birgans v. Louisiana et al
Frederic Lubron Birgans |
State of Louisiana, Michael Linton, John Peters, Bruce Robinson, Jason Honemann, John Nelson, Zach Crooks, Chris Basteard and Metro Police Dept of Monroe |
3:2009cv00926 |
June 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Ouachita |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's civil rights complaint alleging false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (to being asserted agai n if and when the Heck v Humphrey conditions are met) as frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to the provisions of 28 U S C 1915(e)(2). Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 6/10/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Frederic Lubron Birgans, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's civil rights complaint, insofar as it alleges false arrest and imprisonment and malicious prosecution be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (to the ir being asserted again until the Heck v Humphrey conditions are met) as frivolous and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 10/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 9/21/09. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.