Moore v. Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Louisiana Western District Moore v. Social Security Administration

Moore v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Robertine T Moore
Defendant:	U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2010cv01380
Filed:	September 2, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office:	Monroe Office
County:	Lincoln
Presiding Judge:	Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge:	Robert G James
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 22, 2011	Filing 21 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by U S Commissioner Social Security Administration, converted to a motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and 1 Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 8/22/11. (crt,Crawford, A)
September 3, 2010	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robertine T Moore. As stated in this memorandum order, IT IS ORDERED plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. Plaintiff is reminded that she is required to serve the government in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(1). The un-excused failure to perfect and file a return of service within 120 days after filing suit may result in dismissal of the case. LR.41.3W; FRCP4(m). Motions terminated: 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robertine T Moore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 9/3/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 22, 2011

Filing 21 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by U S Commissioner Social Security Administration, converted to a motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and 1 Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 8/22/11. (crt,Crawford, A)

September 3, 2010

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robertine T Moore. As stated in this memorandum order, IT IS ORDERED plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. Plaintiff is reminded that she is required to serve the government in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(1). The un-excused failure to perfect and file a return of service within 120 days after filing suit may result in dismissal of the case. LR.41.3W; FRCP4(m). Motions terminated: 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Robertine T Moore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 9/3/10. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robertine T Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	John A Broadwell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?