Zuffa L L C v. Trappey et al
| Zuffa L L C |
| William Joseph Trappey, III, Bart James Babineaux and Monago Investments L L C |
| 3:2011cv00006 |
| January 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| Ouachita |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims that Defendants are liable for a violation of 47 USC 553 and that Defendants Trappey and Babineaux are vicariously l iable for the same. The Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claim that Trappey's and Babineaux's violation of 47 USC 553 was willful and for commercial gain. This claim is reserved for trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff subm it a brief to the Court by March 30, 2012, addressing (1) damages for a non-willful violation of 47 USC 553; and (2) its intent to pursue or seek dismissal of the copyright claim alleged in Count II of its Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff opposes the Court's intended dismissal of Count I, it shall file a memorandum in opposition by March 30, 2012. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 3/22/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 15 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 11/17/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
