Williams v. Shumate et al
| Ken Williams |
| Brandon Burch, Jody McJimsey, Stevie Hayes, Shanna Mills, Jane Doe, Bryan Brown, Calvin Barnes, Johnny Hedgemon, John Doe, Alvin Jones, Edward Knight, Joe Poche, Rene Jones, Ronnie Harris and Mark Shumate |
| 3:2012cv01257 |
| May 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| West Carroll |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Robert G James |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation 5 , and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling 7 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for a hearing 6 contained in his Objections to the Report and Recommendation, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint be DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisions of 28 U. S. C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Order/Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Beaumont, Texas. Signed by Chief Judge Robert G James on 7/12/12. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
