Logan v. Madison Parish Detention Center et al
Kevin Lamont Logan |
Warden, Madison Parish Detention Center, Sheriff of Madison Parish, Johnson and Washington |
3:2012cv02221 |
August 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Madison |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 50 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, contained within his objections to the Report and Recommendation 51 is DENIED. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 37 Mo tion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendants Madison Parish Detention Center, Larry Cox, Major Johnson, Captain Brooke, and Mrs. Washington, be GRANTED, and that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d). Signed by Judge Robert G James on 1/14/14. (crt,DickersonSld, D) |
Filing 39 ORDER denying 31 Motion to Compel Discovery; denying 31 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline; denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration re 30 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 31 Motion for Leave to Add an Additional Defendant; and denying 31 Request for expenses incurred in making the Motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 10/25/13. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.