Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc

Plaintiff: Raymond W Davis
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Case Number: 3:2012cv02755
Filed: October 24, 2012
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Ouachita
Presiding Judge: Donald E Walter
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 5, 2013 27 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM RULING: for the reasons assigned herein, the motion for summary judgment filed by Wal-Mart 14 is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 11/5/2013. (crt,Joffrion, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond W Davis
Represented By: James Eugene Mixon
Represented By: Brian Edward Frazier
Represented By: James L Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?