Goldston v. City of Monroe

Plaintiff: Lonnie Goldston
Defendant: City of Monroe
Case Number: 3:2013cv00314
Filed: February 9, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Ouachita
Presiding Judge: Donald E Walter
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 14, 2014 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM RULING: Having reviewed the motions, the submissions and oral arguments of the parties, and the applicable law, the City of Monroe's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment are hereby GRANTED. For the reasons assigned herein, this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 3/13/2014. (crt,Joffrion, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goldston v. City of Monroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Monroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lonnie Goldston
Represented By: Louis Granderson Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?