Burgess v. Union Parish Detention Center

Defendant: Union Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff: Scott D Burgess
Case Number: 3:2013cv00903
Filed: May 1, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Union
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: James T Trimble
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 5, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM RULING re 8 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim filed by Union Parish Detention Center, Police Jury of Union Parish. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 11/5/13. (crt,Guillot, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burgess v. Union Parish Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Parish Detention Center
Represented By: Trevor S Fry(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Steven M Oxenhandler(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Joseph H L Perez-Montes(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott D Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.