Bethley v. Christus Health Central Louisiana

Plaintiff: Lakeisha Bethley
Defendant: Christus Health Central Louisiana
Case Number: 3:2013cv02939
Filed: October 25, 2013
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
County: Ouachita
Presiding Judge: Donald E Walter
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2015 24 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: For the reasons assigned in the foregoing 23 Memorandum Ruling, IT IS ORDERED the 12 Motion for Summary Judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims be and are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 1/9/2015. (crt,Putch, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bethley v. Christus Health Central Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christus Health Central Louisiana
Represented By: S Price Barker
Represented By: Brian Ross Carnie
Represented By: Michael D Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakeisha Bethley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?