MasTec North America, Inc. v. San Antonio Texas et al
| MasTec North America Inc |
| City of San Antonio Texas doing business as C P S Energy |
| David Harmon Dickson |
| 3:2013mc00026 |
| July 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Monroe Office |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Compel. FURTHER ORDERED that Mr David Harmon Dickson shall appear for a deposition at 10:00 a.m. on August 8, 2013, at the offices of Hudson Potts & Bernstein LLP, 1800 Hudson Lane, Ste 300, Monroe, La 71201. At that deposition Mr Dickson shall produce the documents listed in Exhibit C attached to this Order and he shall respond under oath to the questions asked of him by counsel for the parties in Cae No 5:12cv00682-HLH. Counsel for the parties in Case No 5:12cv00682-HLH shall be allowed to question Mr Dickson for at least seven hours. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 7/23/13. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C) (crt,Lundy, N)
|
| Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes added. (crt,Lundy, N) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel by MasTec North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Attorney George Adam Cossey added to party MasTec North America, Inc.(pty:pla))(aty,Cossey, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
