McKissick v. Williams et al

Case Number: 3:2015cv00133
Filed: January 23, 2015
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Monroe Office
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 17, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: After an independent review of the record, including Plaintiffs objections, for those reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Hayes Report and Recommendation 20 , which the Court finds to be correct under the law, and for the additional r easons in this Courts Ruling 22 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs civil rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted in accordance with the provisio ns of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court provide a copy of the Complaint, along with this Courts Ruling and Judgment, to Plaintiff at his last known address. The Clerk of Court is instructed to send a copy of this Order/Judgment to the keeper of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/17/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKissick v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?