Pugh v. LaSalle Management Corp
Plaintiff: Albert Pugh
Defendant: LaSalle Management Corp
Case Number: 3:2015cv01498
Filed: April 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Monroe Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation re 1 Complaint filed by Albert Pugh. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's civil rights Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P Rule 41(b) and Local Rule 41.3. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/11/15. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pugh v. LaSalle Management Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Pugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LaSalle Management Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?