Payne v. Cain
Plaintiff: Lanford Anthony Payne
Defendant: N Burl Cain
Case Number: 3:2015cv02747
Filed: November 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Monroe Office
County: West Feliciana
Presiding Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Robert G James
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed by Lanford Anthony Payne is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 7/27/16. (crt,Crawford, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lanford Anthony Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N Burl Cain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?