Evans et al v. Johnson et al
Tiffany Evans, Mark Evans and James E Gipson, Jr |
Vernon L Johnson, American Motor Transportation Inc and National Liability & Fire Insurance Co |
3:2016cv00081 |
January 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Lincoln |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM ORDER. The 71 Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED; the prior 62 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs' claims against these two purported Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 2/6/2018. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING 43 Motion to Quash service of process on Johnson and American Motor Transportation; DENYING 43 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike 42 Notice; DENYING AS MOOT subsequent 53 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Quash, Motion to Strike 52 Affidavit. Plaintiffs are allowed until AUGUST 15, 2017 to properly serve the unserved Defendants. The current 41 Scheduling Order is UPSET and case is referred to Magistrate Judge Hayes for scheduling conference to be held after service is properly effected and documented in the record. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 7/17/2017. (crt,Crick, S) Modified on 7/18/2017 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.