Prudhomme v. Russell et al
Lasques Vasques Prudhomme |
Jay Russell, Patrick Johnson, Donna Norman, William K McConnell, John Creed, Ray Henson, Myra Ross, Sheriffs Office Ouachita Parish, Richwood Correctional Center L L C, Police Jury of Ouachita Parish and Insurance Companies X Y Z |
3:2017cv01344 |
October 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Monroe Office |
Ouachita |
Karen L Hayes |
Robert G James |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 JUDGMENT adopting 86 Report and Recommendations and additional reasons stated in Court's Ruling, the Civil Action Nos 17-1344 and 17-1382 are hereby UNCONSOLIDATED; 80 Motion for Sanctions and associated request for fees is DENIED; 58 Mo tion for Sanctions Regarding Paternity/Filiation is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Prudhomme's federal and state law claims against all Defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, thereby closing Civil Action No. 17-1344. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 1/2/2019. (crt,FinnSld, P) Modified on 1/3/2019 to correct date (FinnSld, P). |
Filing 30 JUDGMENT Adopting 22 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims against the Ouachita Parish Police Jury only are Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 5/7/2018. (crt,Crawford, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.