Wilson v. Northeast Wendys Management et al
| Jazmine V Wilson |
| Rebecca Fuller, New Wendys Inc, David Burkett and Northeast Wendys Management |
| 3:2018cv01049 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to David Burkett, Rebecca Fuller, New Wendys Inc, Northeast Wendys Management. (crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 8/16/2018. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jazmine V Wilson. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Burkett, Rebecca Fuller, New Wendys Inc, Northeast Wendys Management filed by Jazmine V Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed summons/writ)(crt,Miletello, A) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
