Cummings et al v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
Todd Cummings and Kimberly Cummings |
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc |
3:2019cv00024 |
January 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Karen L Hayes |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Hobby Lobby Stores Inc, List of Parties and Pleadings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(aty,Wanek, Peter) Modified on 2/12/2019 to edit text (FinnSld, P). |
|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.(aty,Wanek, Peter) Modified on 1/16/2019 to edit text (FinnSld, P). |
|
Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,FinnSld, P) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (aty,Faulkner, Lindsay) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 4th JDC Ouachita Parish, Case Number 18-3651 with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3846310) filed by Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Lindsay Graham Faulkner added to party Hobby Lobby Stores Inc(pty:dft))(aty,Faulkner, Lindsay) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,FinnSld, P) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.