Schofield v. Beckham et al
Morris Demond Schofield |
John Toffton and Phil Beckham |
3:2019cv00234 |
February 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Karen L Hayes |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO STRIKE #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 4/22/2019. (crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff submitted an IFP application not completed by an authorized Accounts Officer. Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 4/1/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 2/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Williams, L) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Williams, L) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Morris Demond Schofield. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 2/27/2019 to reflect submission as Deficient (Williams, L). |
Filing 1 ***STRICKEN*** COMPLAINT against Phil Beckham, John Toffton filed by Morris Demond Schofield. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 4/22/2019 to indicate as stricken (Leday, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.