Walker v. Johnson et al
Richard Lavelle Walker |
Deputy Smith, T Breaux, C L Fondren, Jay Russell, Pat Johnson, Ms Braux, Lt Murphy, Ms Whitten and Ms Founder |
3:2019cv00673 |
May 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Karen L Hayes |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER : IT IS ORDERED that the Memorandum Order granting Plaintiff in forma pauperis status, document #9 , is REVOKED AND RESCINDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for Plaintiffs claims to remain viable, Plaintiff must pay the full four-hundred-dollar ($400.00) filing fee in one lump sum within twenty (21) days from the date of this Memorandum Order. FAILURE TO PAY THE FULL FILING FEE WILL RESULT IN THE PLEADINGS BEING STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 7/17/2019. (crt,ThomasSld, T) |
Filing 9 (REVOKED AND RESCINDED) MEMORANDUM ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. No initial filing fee due. Further ordered that plaintiff make payments of 20 percent of income for preceding month until $350.00 has been paid in full. Clerk manually noticed Prison Accounts Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 7/10/2019. (crt,ThomasSld, T) Modified on 7/17/2019 (ThomasSld, T). |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER re #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 7 CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled Certificate page filed by Richard Lavelle Walker regarding #6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Lavelle Walker. (Certificate page not signed. Clerk resent to plaintiff for signature.) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) Modified to remove deficiency notation on 7/9/2019 (Haik, K). |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Pat Johnson, Smith, Founder, Braux, Murphy, Whitten filed by Richard Lavelle Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit signature list, #2 Facts in support, #3 Exhibits, #4 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms.Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 6/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 5/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights complaint form, #2 IFP application)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 2 DEFICIENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Lavelle Walker. Documents filed were the forms completed by the institution certifying the prison account. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A). Application not on approved forms. |
Filing 1 DEFICIENT COMPLAINT against T Breaux, C L Fondren, Pat Johnson, Jay Russell, Smith filed by Richard Lavelle Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Complaint not on approved forms. |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.