Kansas City Southern Railway Co v. Shan of Monroe L L C et al
Kansas City Southern Railway Co |
Welco of West Monroe Inc, XYZ-1 Insurance Company, Shan of Monroe, LLC, XYZ Company, XYZ-2 Insurance Company, X Y Z Co, X Y Z Insurance Co and Shan of Monroe L L C |
3:2019cv01569 |
December 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Karen L Hayes |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kansas City Southern Railway Co. Welco of West Monroe Inc served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020. (aty,Gilliam, Bobby) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kansas City Southern Railway Co. Shan of Monroe L L C served on 1/30/2020, answer due 2/20/2020. (aty,Gilliam, Bobby) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Shan of Monroe L L C, Welco of West Monroe Inc (crt,Bunting, M) |
Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes added. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shan of Monroe, LLC, Welco of West Monroe Inc, XYZ Company, XYZ-1 Insurance Company, XYZ-2 Insurance Company (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4127251) filed by Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Bobby S Gilliam added to party Kansas City Southern Railway Co(pty:pla))(aty,Gilliam, Bobby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.