Campbell v. Sturdivant et al
| Eugene Campbell |
| Jeremy Sturdivant, Caleb Smith and Sharona Daniel |
| 3:2020cv00068 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sharona Daniel, Caleb Smith, Jeremy Sturdivant. (crt,Crawford, A) |
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Eugene Campbell in the amount of $400.00, receipt number 34635003705. (crt,MiletelloSld, A) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner pay the $400.00 filing fee within 30 days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the petition being stricken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 1/17/2020. (crt,Miletello, A)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eugene Campbell. (crt,Miletello, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/16/2020: #1 Proposed order) (Thigpen, M). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sharona Daniel, Caleb Smith, Jeremy Sturdivant with Jury Demand filed by Eugene Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
