C I T Bank N A v. Cupit
| CIT Bank, N.A. and C I T Bank N A |
| Edward Cupit |
| 3:2020cv00506 |
| April 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Edward Cupit (crt,Jones, P) |
| Filing 5 MOTION/REQUEST for Entry of Default as to Edward Cupit by C I T Bank N A. Motions referred to Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(aty,Chaney, Mark) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by C I T Bank N A. Edward Cupit served on 5/15/2020, answer due 6/5/2020. (aty,Chaney, Mark) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by C I T Bank N A naming C I T Group Inc as a corporate parent. (aty,Chaney, Mark) Modified on 5/8/2020 to add corporate parent (Jones, P). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Edward Cupit. (crt,Jones, P) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward Cupit (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4242742) filed by C I T Bank N A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Summons, #6 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Mark James Chaney, III added to party C I T Bank N A(pty:pla))(aty,Chaney, Mark) Modified on 4/22/2020 to edit text (Jones, P). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Jones, P) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
