Tahtiyork v. Homeland Security et al
Metoh Mbah Wiliam Tahityork and Metoh Mbah William Tahtiyork |
Dept of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs Enforcement and U S Dept of Homeland Security |
3:2020cv01196 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Karen L Hayes |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Directing plaintiff to amend complaint/petition. Pro Se Response due by 11/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 10/23/2020. (crt,Leday, A) |
FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Metoh Mbah William Tahtiyork in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 64635008270. (crt,Thomas, T) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 10/21/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 9/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP application)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/18/2020. (crt,Devillier, W) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Devillier, W) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Metoh Mbah Wiliam Tahityork. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.