Boyd v. Monroe City Hall
Plaintiff: Charles Howard Boyd
Defendant: Monroe City Hall
Case Number: 3:2020cv01473
Filed: November 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Terry A Doughty
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 1/13/2021. (crt,Leday, A)
January 12, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Charles Howard Boyd. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 1/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(crt,Miletello, A)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 12/21/2020. (crt,Leday, A)
December 17, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Charles Howard Boyd. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/17/2020. (crt,Miletello, A)
December 17, 2020 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Monroe City Hall filed by Charles Howard Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(crt,Miletello, A)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Monroe City Hall answer due 1/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 12/17/2020. (crt,Leday, A)
December 16, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint with consent by Monroe City Hall. Motions referred to Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(Attorney Brandon Wade Creekbaum added to party Monroe City Hall(pty:dft))(aty,Creekbaum, Brandon)
December 1, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charles Howard Boyd. Monroe City Hall served on 12/1/2020, answer due 12/22/2020. (crt,Miletello, A)
November 19, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Monroe City Hall. (crt,Leday, A)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 11/19/2020. (crt,Leday, A)
November 17, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Howard Boyd. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/17/2020. (crt,Miletello, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2020: #1 Proposed order) (Dauterive, C).
November 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monroe City Hall filed by Charles Howard Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit)(crt,Miletello, A)
November 17, 2020 CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Dauterive, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Monroe City Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Howard Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monroe City Hall
Represented By: Brandon Wade Creekbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?