Reed v. Ranatza
| Christopher Reed |
| Sheryl M Ranatza |
| 3:2021cv02272 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Per 7 Electronic Order - Compliance Deadline set for 9/9/2021. (crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion to Amend/Correct. The undersigned notes both this filing as well as the "amendment" filed as doc. #6. Plaintiff is reminded, however, that he has until September 9, 2021, to file, by placing in the prison mailing system, an amendment fully compliant with the Court's August 10, 2021 Memorandum Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 8/24/2021. (jud,McClusky, Kayla)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sheryl M Ranatza filed by Christopher Reed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Christopher Reed. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Directing plaintiff to amend complaint within 30 days of the filing of this Order to cure deficiencies outlined. Plaintiff shall dismiss any claims that he is unable to cure through amendment. Plaintiff shall also notify the Court of any change in his address. Pro Se Response due by 9/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 8/10/2021. (crt,Leday, A)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial Filing Fee due in the amount of $62.27. It is further ordered that plaintiff make payments of 20 percent of income for preceding month until $350.00 has been paid in full. Clerk manually noticed Prison Accounts Officer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 8/5/2021. (crt,Haik, K)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Taylor, L) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Reed. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Whitener, M) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2021: #2 Proposed order) (Taylor, L). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sheryl M Ranatza filed by Christopher Reed. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Whitener, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed v. Ranatza | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Reed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sheryl M Ranatza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
