Awan L L C v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co
Awan, LLC dba Maple Mart and Awan L L C doing business as Maple Mart |
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company and Shelter Mutual Insurance Co |
3:2022cv01078 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Kayla D McClusky |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. (aty,Wilkes, Gregg) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.(Attorney Gregg A Wilkes added to party Shelter Mutual Insurance Co(pty:dft))(aty,Wilkes, Gregg) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. (crt,Bunting, M) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Awan, LLC dba Maple Mart. (aty,Barcus, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shelter Mutual Insurance Co (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5079761) filed by Awan L L C. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Michael S Barcus added to party Awan, LLC dba Maple Mart(pty:pla))(aty,Barcus, Michael) Modified docket text on 4/25/2022 (Bunting, M). (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/25/2022) (Bunting, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.