Garcia v. Maxum Indemnity Co
Rolando Garcia |
Maxum Indemnity Co |
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole |
3:2022cv03844 |
August 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Terry A Doughty |
Kayla D McClusky |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER staying cases filed by the McClenny, Moseley, and Associates Firm until further order of this Court. See PDF of order for more information. Signed by Judge James D Cain, Jr on 10/21/2022. (crt,Whidden, C) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Maxum Indemnity Co. (crt,Alexander, E) |
Filing 2 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Judge Terry A Doughty on 9/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(crt,Alexander, E) |
ELECTRONIC PAYMENT of Civil Case filing fee by Rolando Garcia. ( Filing Fee: $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5268865) . (aty,Gardiner, Grant) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Alexander, E) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Maxum Indemnity Company with Jury Demand (Daily credit card transactions limit reached via pay.gov - Payment will be made on another date) filed by Rolando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Grant Gardiner added to party Rolando Garcia(pty:pla))(aty,Gardiner, Grant) Modified text on 8/29/2022. (Alexander, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.