Wilson v. Walmart Inc
| Roshunda M Wilson |
| Walmart Inc |
| 3:2022cv05184 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER re 6 Motion to Remand, Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/31/2022. (crt,Mitchell, P) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Walmart Inc . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(aty,Joffrion, Jacob) |
Filing 9
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 9/26/2022. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart Inc. (aty,Joffrion, Jacob) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Deficiency to James E Ross, Jr on behalf of Roshunda M Wilson regarding 6 Motion to Remand, MOTION for Attorney Fees. Reason: This motion requires a memorandum in support. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| Filing 6 DEFICIENT ? MOTION for Attorney Fees by Roshunda M Wilson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY to capture motion relief filed within text of 6 MOTION to Remand filed as Corrective Document. (crt,Alexander, E) Modified on 9/12/2022 to reflect as deficient. (Alexander, E) |
| NOTICE of Corrective Action to James E Ross, Jr on behalf of Roshunda M Wilson regarding #5 (FILED IN ERROR) MOTION to Remand. Action taken: Modified text of entry to reflect filed in error. Counsel resubmitted motion in its entirety as 6 Motion to Remand. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| Filing 6 DEFICIENT ? MOTION to Remand filed as CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled Motion to Remand filed by Roshunda M Wilson regarding #5 MOTION to Remand. (aty,Ross, James) Modified on 9/9/2022 to more accurately identify pleading filed. (Alexander, E) Modified on 9/12/2022 to reflect as deficient. (Alexander, E) |
| Filing 5 (FILED IN ERROR) MOTION to Remand by Roshunda M Wilson. Motions referred to Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/8/2022. (aty,Ross, James) Modified on 9/9/2022 to reflect filed in error. Counsel resubmitted motion in its entirety as 6 Motion to Remand. (Alexander, E) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Jacob Ryan Joffrion on behalf of Walmart Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 9/20/2022. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 9/6/2022. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc, filed in C-22-00821, 4th JDC, Ouachita Parish, on 5/11/22. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY as pleading filed within pdf of attachment to #1 Notice of Removal Order.(crt,Alexander, E) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Alexander, E) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Walmart Inc. (aty,Joffrion, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 4th JDC Ouachita Parish, Case Number C-2022-0821 with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5257481) filed by Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Exhibit Ex. B, #3 Ex. C)(Attorney Jacob Ryan Joffrion added to party Walmart Inc(pty:dft))(aty,Joffrion, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
