Linn v. U Chain
| Montreal Linn |
| U Chain |
| 3:2022cv06258 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. U Chain answer due 3/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 2/22/2023. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Montreal Linn. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with opposition by U Chain. Motions referred to Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Opposition E-mail, #2 Proposed order)(Attorney Edward Francis Harold added to party U Chain(pty:dft))(aty,Harold, Edward) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Consent to Receive Notice and Service Electronically by Montreal Linn. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE filed by Montreal Linn as to U Chain served on 1/28/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint, by Montreal Linn. (crt,Miletello, A) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to U Chain. (crt,Leday, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 1/9/2023. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| CASE Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky due to clerical error. Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Whidden, C) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Montreal Linn. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/29/2022. (crt,Miletello, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/3/2023: #1 Proposed order) (Whitener, M). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/4/2023) (Whitener, M). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U Chain filed by Montreal Linn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(crt,Miletello, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/3/2023: #2 Civil cover sheet) (Miletello, A). (Attachment 1 replaced with correct exhibit on 1/10/2023) (Miletello, A). |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Linn v. U Chain | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Montreal Linn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U Chain | |
| Represented By: | Edward Francis Harold |
| Represented By: | Lawrence J Sorohan, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
