Henderson v. D G Foods L L C
| Derek Henderson |
| DG Foods, LLC and D G Foods L L C |
| 3:2023cv01602 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for appearance of Jay David Ellwanger for Derek Henderson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 11/20/2023. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Jay D. Ellwanger to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Admission fee: $105, receipt number ALAWDC-5765873) by Derek Henderson. Motions referred to Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of good standing, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Bohrer, Philip) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to D G Foods L L C. (crt,Crick, S) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DG Foods, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5755419) filed by Derek Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Attorney Philip Bohrer added to party Derek Henderson(pty:pla))(aty,Bohrer, Philip) |
| REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to DG Foods, LLC, requested by Derek Henderson. (aty,Bohrer, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
