Jackson v. Walmart Inc
Kimberly Jackson |
Walmart Inc |
3:2024cv00895 |
July 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
David C Joseph |
Kayla D McClusky |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc.(aty,Wolf, Scott) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Walmart Inc . (aty,Wolf, Scott) |
Filing 7 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 7/10/2024. (crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart Inc identifying Corporate Parent Wal-Mart Inc. for Walmart Inc. (aty,Wolf, Scott) |
Filing 5 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Walmart Inc. (aty,Wolf, Scott) |
Filing 4 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/8/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Scott R Wolf on behalf of Walmart Inc AND George William Jackson on behalf of Kimberly Jackson. Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement due by 7/22/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Scott R Wolf on behalf of Walmart Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 7/22/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
REMARK: A duplicate charge was incurred during the filing of the #1 Notice of Removal. Pursuant to the request from the office of Scott R Wolf, a refund of the the initial filing fee paid of $405.00 has been processed in pay.gov this date. Counsel is advised to verify the refund on their statement. (crt,McInnis, S) |
CASE Assigned to Judge David C Joseph and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Bunting, M) |
STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Walmart Inc answer due 7/16/2024. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY - NO PDF ATTACHED, see #1 NOTICE of Removal, attachment #2. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 3rd JDC Lincoln Parish, Case Number 63,822 with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-5990932) filed by Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Attorney Scott R Wolf added to party Wal-Mart, Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Wolf, Scott) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/8/2024) (Bunting, M). Modified docket text on 7/8/2024 (Bunting, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. Walmart Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kimberly Jackson | |
Represented By: | Galen M Hair |
Represented By: | George William Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart Inc | |
Represented By: | Scott R Wolf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.