Adcock v. Sunquest Properties Inc
Plaintiff: Serena Adcock
Defendant: Sunquest Properties Inc
Case Number: 5:2008cv00962
Filed: July 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Caddo
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Presiding Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting 40 Report and Recommendation. It is ordered that Serena Adcock pay to Sunquest Properties Inc attorney fees, costs and expenses as outlined in this order. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 6/3/2010. (crt,Reasor, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adcock v. Sunquest Properties Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Serena Adcock
Represented By: Nelson Welch Cameron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunquest Properties Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?