Thomas v. Huval et al
| John R Thomas, Jr |
| Huval, Robinson, Nelson, Geya Prudhomme, Ricky Swift, LA Attorney General, Office of Indigent Defenders Board and Medical Staff Caddo Correctional Center |
| 5:2009cv00144 |
| January 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Caddo |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Tom Stagg |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 15 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights claims seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief for his allegedly unconstitutional convictions and sentences be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURT HER ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights claims against Ricky Swift, the Indigent Defender Board, and Geya Prudhomme be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil rights claim against the State of Louisiana through th e Louisiana Attorney General be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for habeas relief be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. The Court denies a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 11/1/2011. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
