Jones v. Shreveport et al
| Lorenzo Jones |
| City of Shreveport and State of Louisiana |
| 5:2010cv00716 |
| April 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Donald E Walter |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 1 Complaint filed by Lorenzo Jones, 10 Amended Complaint filed by Lorenzo Jones, 19 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs civil rights claims seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief for his all egedly unconstitutional conviction and sentence be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) until such time as the Heck conditions are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs civil rights claims against Alex Rubenstien, District Attorney Charles Scott,and Assistant District Attorney Jason Brown be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs civil rights claim against the State of Louisiana be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for habeas relief be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 5/21/2013. (crt,Joffrion, B)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
