Dailey v. Shreveport
Plaintiff: Chad Dailey
Defendant: City of Shreveport
Case Number: 5:2010cv01453
Filed: September 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Caddo
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM RULING: The Court will GRANT the 29 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Henry Whitehorn and the City of Shreveport against plaintiff Kevin Strickland and the 30 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Henry Whitehorn against plaintiff Chad Dailey and plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James J Brady on 9/6/2012. (crt,Dauterive, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dailey v. Shreveport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Dailey
Represented By: Pamela R Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Shreveport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?