Williams v. Louisiana State University Health Science Center et al
| Patricia Williams |
| Louisiana State University Health Science Center and State of Louisiana |
| 5:2010cv01670 |
| November 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM RULING: Based on the foregoing analysis, the defendants' motion for summary judgment 50 is GRANTED and Williams's claims against the defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The court finds there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact with regard to any of Williams' claims against either of the defendants. The defendants' motion to strike 63 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 8/27/2013. (crt,Joffrion, B)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: For the reasons assigned in the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Previously filed herein, and having thoroughly reviewed the record, no written objections having been filed and concurring with the findings of the Magistrate Judge under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED the 22 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part by dismissing any claim for hostile environment and denied in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the plaintiff file a motion for leave to amend her complaint within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 2/8/2012. (crt,Putch, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
