Taylor v. City of Shreveport et al
Kenneth W Taylor |
City of Shreveport, Virginia Hester, City of Shreveport City Court, Lee Irvin, Charles Kelly, IV, Randy Collins, Pamela Lattier and Charlie Caldwell |
5:2011cv00317 |
February 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM RULING re 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims filed by Virginia Hester. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 3/19/2012. (crt,McDonnell, D) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM RULING granting 21 MOTION to Dismiss Judge Lee Irvin, Judge Charles Kelley IV, Judge Randy Collins and Judge Pammela Lattier filed by Lee Irvin, Charles Kelly, IV, Pamela Lattier, Randy Collins. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 03/07/12. (crt,McDonnell, D) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 29 Motion to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint; denying as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss Shreveport City Court. Counsel for Judge Kelly and Clerk of Court Hester are directed to contact Judge Hicks' office to discuss wheth er they would prefer to address the new allegations in the amended complaint by (1) filing supplemental briefs in support of their motions to dismiss or (2) withdrawing their original motions to dismiss without prejudice and filing new motions to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 10/17/2011. (crt,Alexander, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.