Rideout v. Dixon Correctional Institute
Plaintiff: Barry LaCurtis Rideout
Defendant: Warden of Dixon Correctional Institute
Case Number: 5:2011cv01312
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Shreveport Office
County: East Feliciana
Presiding Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Presiding Judge: Tom Stagg
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT ADOPTING 4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Barry LaCurtis Rideout, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied as untimely. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 8/25/2014. (crt,Joffrion, B)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rideout v. Dixon Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden of Dixon Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry LaCurtis Rideout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?