Kirts v. River Bend Detention Center

Plaintiff: Kevin Deon Kirts
Defendant: Warden River Bend Detention Center
Case Number: 5:2011cv02151
Filed: December 13, 2011
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: East Carroll
Referring Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Presiding Judge: Tom Stagg
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 18, 2012 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kevin Deon Kirts, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 12/18/2012. (crt,Joffrion, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirts v. River Bend Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden River Bend Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Deon Kirts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?