Ameri v. J C Penney Corp Inc et al
| Annette Ameri |
| J C Penney Corp Inc, Prestige Maintenance U S A Ltd and Chartis Claims Inc |
| 5:2012cv02630 |
| October 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
90 DAY ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ORDER for Administrative Closure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 90 days of the signing of this Order, the parties shall submit the appropriate closing document as stated within this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 09/17/2013. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM RULING re 14 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge filed by Annette Ameri re 13 Order on Motion to Remand, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/12/2013. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM RULING denying 5 Motion to Remand. Further, Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve defendant, Chartis Claims Inc, or dismiss it if Plaintiff does not intend to pursue that defendant. Once Chartis has answered or been dismissed, the Court will promptly set a scheduling conference to discuss a trial date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/19/2012. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
