Woodard v. Rent-A-Center East Inc et al
Karen Woodard |
Ray Doe and Rent-A-Center East Inc |
5:2013cv00042 |
January 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
Mark L Hornsby |
Tom Stagg |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations; granting 8 Motion to Compel Arbitration: This case stayed, and the parties are directed to present the gateway question of arbitrability to an arbitrator in accordance with their agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk is directed to close this case for administrative purposes only. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 6/24/2013. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff will be allowed until February 28, 2013 to file a motion for leave to amend her complaint and substitute the actual employee for Ray Doe. If the actual employee is, like Plaintiff, a citizen of Louisiana, the court' s decision on whether to allow the amendment and remand the case will be guided by the factors in Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1987). If Plaintiff does not file a timely motion for leave to amend and substitute the actual employee, the claim against Ray Doe will be dismissed and the case will proceed in federal court solely against Rent-A-Center (Compliance Deadline set for 2/28/2013). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 1/11/2013. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.