Mary et al v. Q E P Energy Co
| Cynthia Sue Mary and Pauls Land Co L L C |
| Q E P Energy Co |
| 5:2013cv02195 |
| July 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Acadia |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM RULING re 136 RE-URGED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Q E P Energy Co, 139 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Cynthia Sue Mary, 141 MOTION to Strike 139 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, Alternatively MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Q E P Energy Co. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 3/22/2021. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM RULING re 49 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Q E P Energy Co; 88 MOTION to Strike 87 Affidavit of Eric L Glover; and Affidavit of William J Wood Jr, attachment five (5) of document 85 Exhibits filed by Q E P Energy Co; and 93 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment (Amended & Supplemented) filed by Pauls Land Co L L C, Cynthia Sue Mary. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 12/6/2017. (crt,Williams, L)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 40 MOTION in Limine filed by Q E P Energy Co. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/25/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
