Hicks et al v. Louisiana et al
| Mary F Scaglione and David L Hicks |
| Caddo Parish Animal Control, Caddo Parish Commission, Police Dept of Shreveport, City of Shreveport, State of Louisiana, Phillip Tucker, Morris and Synergy of Shreveport Division |
| 5:2013cv03000 |
| November 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM RULING for the reasons stated, the City of Shreveport's motion to dismiss 21 is GRANTED and Hicks' claims against it are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 8/26/2014. (crt,Joffrion, B)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims against Dirk Morris and Philip Tucker are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 06/11/2014. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations. All claims against the State of Louisiana are dismissed. All claims against the Shreveport Police Department are dismissed. Ms. Scaglione's claim against Synergy of Shreveport Division is dismissed without prejudice. Ms. Scaglione and Synergy are terminated as parties in this case. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 03/05/2014. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
