Ulrich v. Scott et al
| Amber Hahmer Ulrich |
| Charles R Scott, Kenya Ellis, Jordan Bird, City of Shreveport and Terri Scott |
| 5:2014cv00037 |
| January 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM RULING re 64 and 67 MOTIONS for Reconsideration, and 70 MOTION to Amend Complaint. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 9/12/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM RULING re 42 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim filed by Terri Scott, Jimmy N Ray, City of Shreveport, P A Lamotte. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 8/29/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM RULING re 47 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Defendants Prudhomme, Ellis, and Bird filed by Jordan Bird, Geya Prudhomme, Kenya Ellis. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/16/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM RULING re 22 Second MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Kenya Ellis and Jordan Bird filed by Jordan Bird, Kenya Ellis. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 03/24/2015. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM RULING re 12 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim filed by Terri Scott, City of Shreveport. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 03/19/2015. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
